Family Medicen Primary Care Associated I Auburn Al

You know almost how individuals gain control of the power of the State and then abuse that power like former Us President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush U.k. The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Recollect how Bush-league was supported past Great britain Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to bring together the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'due south weapons of mass destruction which did not exist merely which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Discover how they persuade us nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin can save united states of america all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  Information technology had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this twenty-four hour period.

On CHS we wrote previously well-nigh how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the illness came nearly as a result of the interaction of three completely unlike factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, especially nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Large Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty affliction called smallpox and it did kill people long agone.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London'southward first park built subsequently rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent Past Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The center and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could attain this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not piece of work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" notwithstanding contracted the illness: Smallpox Mortality, UK, U.s., Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively brusk but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Physician – Baronial 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, United states & SWEDEN

In the graphs below detect the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, every bit the medical "consensus" view tells the states. Whatsoever vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did non.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Metropolis of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox expiry rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester's approach besides cost far less.

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book equally .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Menstruation.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.viii
British Ground forces (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.1
British Regular army (India)	1860-1908	ii,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	viii.viii
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and example fatality charge per unit per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.iii
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	ane,206	61	5.i

Biggs said "In this comparison, I accept given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I inquire, if the excessive minor-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Imperial Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical written report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the opposite side."

Tabular array 29.

Minor-Pox Epidemics, Price, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Modest-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	xvi.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	nine.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£one,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the budgeted flu season and the enthusiastic calls to employ the flu vaccine, you might exist wondering where the thought of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a uncomplicated tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the aforementioned basic tale of the brilliant ascertainment of a uncomplicated country md and his backbone in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening illness of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'southward hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, but nothing more than. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit balmy, case of the affliction. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox in one case more; again, zip. [1]

Edward Jenner'due south idea somewhen became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, only somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. Every bit the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the globe would exist freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" take been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, specially those that are used to support a belief, accomplish an iconic status while any unsavory aspects nigh the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well earlier the story of our hero. Information technology begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was only a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would practice amend against the illness than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the future.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically skilful. But because of the complication and danger involved, inoculation remained an functioning that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did oftentimes assist protect the individual that was inoculated, but there was withal an estimated ii-5% that died as a effect.[four,5] Still, this was an comeback compared to a twenty-25% bloodshed rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Only, was the divergence in mortality due to inoculation lonely? Or could information technology have had something to practise with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environs than the majority of club?

At that place was 1 major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would take been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the do of variolation would create new vectors to spread information technology. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years earlier the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably similar the plague a contagious disease, what tends to end the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends information technology; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious disease is produced past Inoculation where information technology would not otherwise accept been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a eye of contagion, whence it spreads non less fatally or widely than information technology would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contamination are manifestly multiplied very profoundly past Inoculation . . .[7]

Withal, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Considering variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically connected by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned process.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, assertive these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an eight-year-one-time boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox equally a test to run into if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, information technology was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results challenge lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the fourth dimension who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his exercise.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could take told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the offset at that place were bug with Jenner'due south procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox thing obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were and so tested by existence inoculated with smallpox to run into if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were non in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced past many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community connected to embrace Jenner's ideas among numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated past Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month later it was inoculated with small-pox affair without effect, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Take a chance, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual style from milking. Vii years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. three and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted modest-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of minor-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator'south name was concealed. xiv. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'due south office . . . died of small-pox a yr later on vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living upwardly to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of modest-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is substantially the same fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a straight challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Minor Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the most good practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, later vaccination, people still could contract and even dice from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the do.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the fourth dimension were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new course of income. It is therefore quite significant for a dr. to have spoken out confronting it as Dr. Brown did.

Connected observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also exist infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, ii [1820-1822] there was a peachy hubbub about the small-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to dwelling to Dr. Jenner himself . . . Information technology attacked many who had had pocket-sized-pox before, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, information technology left some alone, simply fell upon groovy numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical do. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, accept taken the existent modest-pox afterwards, and take either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![xv]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination connected for decades, but as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed authority, and there were calls to obtain fresh fabric directly from cows.[16]

While the fable maintained that the vaccine cloth came from cows, Jenner really believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was just smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new illness.[18] This faulty belief would issue in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated information technology onto a cow's udder. He and then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the erstwhile practice of smallpox inoculation.[twenty]

Non only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, merely at that place were also reports of deaths from other causes before long after vaccination. For example, a pare status called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, anile 5 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; i cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a carbohydrate baker, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was beingness used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis past means of the vaccine. I practice this very reluctantly. At nowadays I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Every bit it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more than doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In lodge to deal with this, the judicial arrangement intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did goose egg to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the slap-up 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, there were farther smallpox epidemics in 1859-threescore, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the nearly severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the xx years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph i: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less probable to impale or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were so made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to exist performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were beingness made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the strength of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 solitary they amounted to £54,727, and in the present twelvemonth they will get about a quarter one thousand thousand. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, take been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced then much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A dandy pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were 20-three one thousand four hundred and lx-nine cases of small-pox in that ground forces. The London Lancet of July xv, 1871 said:

Of nine one thousand 3 hundred and ninety-2 small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thou eight hundred and fifty-4 had been vaccinated. Seventeen and i-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than 1 hundred and twenty-two thousand vaccinated persons accept suffered from minor-pox . . . Official returns from Frg evidence that between 1870 and 1885 one 1000000 vaccinated persons died from small-scale-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal freedom and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some fifty-fifty accepted imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same yr Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the apply of fines and jail fourth dimension, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination charge per unit would effect in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Depression vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed every bit the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were loftier.

The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Hither is a great manufacturing town having a population of near a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial exam of an experience extending over a menstruation of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when ninety-5 per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted as a condom procedure, it often caused sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph three). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the aforementioned (Graph iv).

Graph two: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph iii: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summertime of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its loftier decease rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from i in 50 and later to every bit low equally one in 380. The disease could still impale, but having become so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very balmy type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later on gradually spread over the state. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was normally at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The writer of a 1913 commodity in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox expiry rate was effectually twenty%, as it had been historically. The table also showed that after 1896 the death charge per unit vicious off speedily, starting with half-dozen% in 1897 to as low every bit 0.26% past 1908. Every bit the mild class of smallpox replaced the classic blazon, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild disease of babyhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor catching disease of childhood, and is chiefly important because it often gives ascension to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very hard to differentiate clinically.[33]

Past the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced lilliputian in the mode of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the form of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage charge per unit, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was non a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the terminal smallpox decease in the U.s.a. in 1948 upwardly until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 written report detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a peel status due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this illness was estimated by the authors to be betwixt 1 in 20,000 to one in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] Nevertheless, they acknowledged that most cases were not reported and at that place was no authentic bookkeeping on this outcome of vaccination. At that place were likewise an estimated 200 to 300 deaths equally the issue of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time at that place had merely been 1 smallpox expiry in 1948.[36]

The concluding smallpox decease in the Usa post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time in that location take been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is all the same occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected past his war machine male parent afterwards the male parent was vaccinated. Subsequently a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother besides required treatment and virus was plant all over the firm.[38]

Considering of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could really have been even higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the Us. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modernistic health-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire globe?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the thought completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some futurity epidemic might put usa in the incorrect. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural decease and are relieved that the general public is not curious plenty to demand an inquest. In the concurrently our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination every bit almost the simply medically promoted way to deal with disease, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. Yard. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as practical to pocket-sized pox. Dr. Roth get-go claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable as a condom in small-scale-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two tabular array-spoonfuls of vinegar, subsequently breakfast and at evening, for xiv days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic handling died, while among those under ordinary treatment the mortality was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the affliction. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Once more, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the thought of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or four times a twenty-four hours to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past accept been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the front in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a twenty-four hours." The give-and-take may now be regarded as airtight, and smallpox at final is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, just but because most people have been conditioned to accept the age-sometime prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected brute'due south (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the man arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of good for you collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and also gives back up to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is non able to generate acceptable collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar property cells together and, every bit a event, literally comes unglued and falls autonomously.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King's College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-scarce diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living about entirely upon fried salary or fat pork and flour fabricated into batter-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed downward with copious librations of potent coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the nutrition of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil State of war twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For example, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers cached at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at to the lowest degree ii-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common crusade of decease, with the infamous diseases such equally smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for merely a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for i percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such every bit carmine fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (as well known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild babyhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph v & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph half dozen: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doc making a discovery that saved the earth from the destruction of smallpox is a primal medical belief that continues to be echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine religion. But the truthful history shows us a dissimilar reality.

The brand proper name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the earth psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease affair into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is cypher close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and take since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are at present a regular matter from cradle to grave, all in the proper noun of supposedly healthier people. Now that the mantle has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, practise more and more than vaccines seem like a skilful idea to you?

More than information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies can exist establish in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's volume "Dissolving Illusions" which can be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
two.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
iii.Victor C. Vaughan, Md, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Kickoff Planting, Progressive Improvements and Nowadays State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford Academy Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Do of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Confronting Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, Jan 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Human activity of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
xv.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
xvi.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. twenty, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. four, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Doc, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United states," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning time Relate, Midweek, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. CIV, no. 6, February x, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.K. Westward. Harman, MD, "A Doc'south Argument Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. i, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Doctor, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Pocket-sized-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Mag, vol. III, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious disease as Shown past the History of Smallpox in the U.s.a.," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practise of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, West.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos Physician, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. x.
38.Maggie Play tricks, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, Jan 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Germ-free Scientific discipline, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January fifteen, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. Six, no. one, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January four to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Study of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines |

morenosquairron.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post